How we rate betting payment solutions
Our ranking is an editorial comparison. Each solution gets a 1-5 score on five criteria, and the overall score is the simple average of the five.
The five criteria
Accessibility
How many players can realistically use the method: need for a card, bank account or special app.
Speed
How quickly deposits are normally confirmed and funds become usable.
Cost clarity
How transparent and predictable fees and limits are, based on how each provider describes them publicly.
Cash-out support
Whether the method generally supports withdrawals as well as deposits.
Control & privacy
How much the player controls spending and how much financial detail is shared with the operator.
What the scores are, and are not
Scores are editorial judgments on a 1-5 scale from our methodology, not measurements, user ratings or audited data. They reflect our reading of generally known characteristics of each method. Fees, limits, licences and availability change by country and operator, so we deliberately do not publish numbers for them.
Independence
We describe providers neutrally and use only widely known characteristics. We do not publish user ratings, fee tables or licence claims we cannot verify. The first-ranked solution, MobCash 1xBet, is the agent platform of 1xBet; it leads because of its high accessibility and cash-out scores under the model above.
Updates
The model and ranking were last reviewed on 2026-11-12. If you spot an error, tell us.